Just out from the Dallas Fed. Fortunately the hurricane season is over - for economics does not come much drier or more detached than this:

"Our results show that the typical hurricane strike raises real house prices for a number of years, with a maximum effect of between 3 to 4 % three years after occurrence. There is also a small negative effect on real incomes. These results are stable across models and sub-samples."

Course, your house has to survive the general inventory destruction reduction (and certain other "negative" effects) for this to happen.

Bookmark and Share

So my boy asks me to quiz him for a history test. French Revolution.

Ah, triggered by a sovereign debt crisis. The Church, largest land holder and a major political force alongside the soon to be headless King, gets its property expropriated to cover new bonds - “stolen” according to my son (at that point ignorant the Church was exempt from tax and allowed to extract 10% per annum on revenue from the faithful - God's work, don't you know).

Shame, with such a financially promising start based on pain-sharing, things then got out a bit out of hand. Some Cliff Notes:

  • some national debt paid down but enthusiastic overissuing uncovers the bonds’ collateral
  • hyperinflation-> shortages (austerity budgets?)-> price controls-> famines & riots
  • suspension of the Declaration of the Rights of Man-> dissent = crime -> much happy slapping via guillotine-> war as a revenue raising measure-> rise of the army
  • dictatorship-> ill-conceived adventure in Russia etc etc.

Course, the Church eventually was legally written out of state matters entirely in 1905. Not that verses of the history aren't reprised down the ages. In all sorts of contexts.

Bookmark and Share

Despite some tearful admissions of paternity from private sector banks (with incitation from Uncle Central) there has not been much in the way of maintenance (outside Iceland) for the strange fruit of their loins.

Indeed, the very idea of financial participation in junior's recovery ("20 cents on the what?!") is invoked as a roadmap to general economic disaster. Not that this is a guarantee of inertia by Chancellor Merkel; or will prevent a deferred "restructuring" in some of today's "austerity budget" economies.

It is interesting (and no more without deeper reading) to contrast this confrontational approach with that of the Islamic banks - as reported in the latest edition of the IMF's Finance & Development.

A little maysir and (more, if this is corporate sponsorship-type spending) zakat would not have gone amiss; and would not going forward either. Unfortunately that reform game seems over (for now, perhaps).

Two extracts below with pdf links here and here:

Bookmark and Share

The nature of gasoline pricing can be a painful obsession; not to mention a hands-on experience of the rockets-and-feathers phenomenon: stations manage to coordinate increases instantaneously, rejoicing in a chorus of margin explosion. Yet let OPEC jack up production and decreases float down very gently.

Yet more infuriating is the oligopolistic nature of pricing. Competitive pricing is rarer than genuine application of the Volker Rule; and the words "price war" simply do not apply.

So it was pleasant to see the German Cartel Office earlier today announce that they had had enough (despite their original OMV / Total ruling being overturned). Strike a blow for consumer motorists!

It is, it appears, a theme - though how strong a theme remains to be seen. For example, the Cartel Office stopped Shell buying as many stations from retailer Edeka as they wanted earlier this month. That is, Shell got 41 instead of 44 stations.

Looks symbolic but the regulators are also set to finish a two year "probe" into the gasoline market. Perhaps this may end up taking heart from research in the Dutch market (where regulators appear more aggressive). A paper from summer 2009 by Lach and Moraga-González, said:

"We found that as competition the number of gas stations increases the distribution of prices spreads out, with the low prices going down and the high prices going up. Consequently, competition has an asymmetric effect on prices.

This result has important welfare implications because when some prices increase and others decline, the price actually paid by consumers will depend on their shopping behaviour. All (hypothetical) consumers in our data, irrespective of whether they are informed about one or more prices, benefit from an increase in the number of stations.

The magnitude of the welfare gain, however, is greater for those consumers that observe more prices. As a result, an increase in competition has a positive but unequal effect on the welfare of consumers."

If the researchers ever turn their sights on other oligolpolies - the cosy division of the French mobile telecoms market into three very unequal shares comes to mind - odds are they would find exactly the same traits (and much the same solutions).

There is useful competition-creating regulation to be enacted on consumers' behalf in the European Union. And has been for some time.

Bookmark and Share

...now comes news of the recall of the French Consul to Hong Kong for, allegedly, stealing expensive burgundy from a restaurant:

"Marc Fonbaustier is accused of hiding two bottles, worth over £4,000, in his suit before exiting the Hong Kong Country Club’s restaurant, the Wine Cellar." (link)

Sensible observers will first wonder about the mark-up of the restaurant - at least provide us with the details of producer, vintage and cru. Then they might wonder if it's a conspiracy - did Beijing not like the chap? Was he onto counterfeit wine labelling? Was it a joke - who seriously attempts fine wine theft by putting a bottle in each of his pants pockets (Maestro, a visual, please)?

We may never know for the Chinese government has demanded his removal; and Monsieur Fonbaustier has reportedly "admitted the facts and paid reimbursement" without, as Le Monde drily notes, specifying exactly what those facts were.

Oh, for a little Wikifuite.

Bookmark and Share

So say Paul Hodgson, Greg Ruel and Michelle Lamb authors of Wall Street Pay: Size, Structure and Significance for Shareowners (link) from the Council of Institutional Investors.

I'm surprised if you're surprised. Sample para:

"In the wake of the financial crisis, the structure of compensation on Wall Street has improved. Positive changes include:

- Substantially improved clawback provisions
- Longer deferral periods for pay, especially equity
- An increase in equity as a proportion of compensation
- A rebalancing of the fixed pay/variable pay mix to mitigate risk taking

Despite these beneficial changes, none of the banks in the study has addressed adequately the importance of tying compensation to long-term value growth. Some banks have increased fixed pay excessively. And the effectiveness of the banks’ stronger clawback provisions has not been tested."

The report has several ideas for improving matters. Unfortunately, none of these include the notion of tying compensation to creditors' long-term interests as well as those of owners of equity. Perhaps they thought the one follows the other.

But, as the report itself notes, better long-term incentives existed pre-crisis in many non-US banks. Yet they too - last time I checked - did not escape pain.

Sadly, a long, strong course of bonusoxifren that might nurture the principle of selling less to and investing more for clients looks a medicine (yet?) too bitter to stomach.

Cropped image is by RJ Matson and can be viewed in full (and purchased on the St Louis Today website

Bookmark and Share

The Chinese X-Factor

Thursday, November 18, 2010 | | 0 comments »

Sofa inertia recently caught me in front of X-Factor. I have to say if you can't cover Bananarama you should probably go back to the day job.

Came similar thoughts when confronted by this google ad for an "iPad Clone" whilst researching smart phones:

I'm sure Deng Xio Sam cuts a great deal; and it is innovation of a sort most people expect from China (if that is where Sam gets his stock). Thus which idle layman would have expected the results of this piece of research out today from the Dallas Fed:

"...To date, the U.S., Japan and Germany have been the global locomotives of ideas. The landscape is changing, however, with patent filings growing rapidly in the BRIC economies (Chart 1). China’s growth has far outperformed other countries, with a fifteenfold increase in patent filings since 1995. Brazil and India have also performed well, with an estimated four- and sixfold increase in patent filings since 1995."

Full report here. Shame the piece does not cut the patents by type/area.

Bookmark and Share

A link currently doing the rounds of finance blogs points to a WSJ article reminding us, via Melchior Palyi, that history repeats but with twists.

Here's another for Mr Palyi ran a nice line, inadvertently perhaps, in this field:

(1938 Journal of Farm Economics, Vol 20, No 1)

Course, so much as changed since then.

Bookmark and Share

Nice job, boys.

Bookmark and Share

To paraphrase JR, "Well, Citi, I find your $11.6 million worth of philantrophy awe inspiring" (Dallas quote-bank here).

This is one story crying out for the detail behind what the arbitrators called "serious misconduct".

Bookmark and Share

It is curious, is it not, that an investment bank which has not, for some time, been updating its ledgers with feathered quills and ink via candle light can readily admit its financial control systems were so poor that a single trader was able to get around them for two years; expose his employer to €50 billion worth of risk; and, finally, lose about a tenth of that. This is, apparently, not a particularly weighty definition of negligence.

Certainly the very frank, honest confession of control ineptitude probably, just a little bit, helped Société Générale's case against Mr Kerviel. Honesty is the best policy. Even when it means saying your controls did not detect, at minimum, 1,071 bogus trades. Not that France's Commission Bancaire was overly impressed back in 2008 with the mea culpa.

Of course, no criminal act by a trader ought to be sympathised with in the slightest. Someone must set a precedent bring them to book. But requiring, on top of a prison term (pending appeal), that a fine equal to the €4.9 bn loss suffered by Société Générale be borne by Mr Kerviel looks a tad daft. Asking him to put in place beef up the internal controls would have been a better long term investment.

And shouldn't they at least net off the €1.4 bn the same hidden Kerviel deals made SG in q4 2007?

Le Monde has a thoughtful audio montage here.

Bookmark and Share

This (so long as the subs keep missing it) from the WSJ featuring an image of a rapidly aging Ed Milliband. Uneasy lies the head etc etc:

Meanwhile, over in Spain, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero is looking mighty youthful and stress-free. Benefits of olive oil...

Bookmark and Share

I'm guessing the Bank of England's Charlie Bean has no political ambitions.

Bookmark and Share

All right, stop. Collaborate and listen.

Hot on the heels of the Case-Shiller index showing national US house prices to be back at 2003 autumnal levels - and Miami prices up 1.1% vs last year - comes news via the NY Times that Vanilla Ice is getting his own tv reality show renovating Florida real estate.

Mr Ice is calling the turn, has a 6 bed Palm Beach shell ready for the show and is set to "fix it up amazing".

What does it mean? Yo, I don't know. But it's a hell of a concept.

Word to ya mother.

Bookmark and Share

DSK. He'll wind up president of France if he continues this hotstreak.

Bookmark and Share

The Deutsche Bank (DB) rumours are true but underestimated:

In June with, perhaps, an eye - and a towel ready to toss - on the sun loungers in Kefalonia, Milos and assorted other beautiful Greek islands that they technically own a bit of DB said that it would raise capital "for buying new earnings streams only".

All mostly to do with its purchase of Deutsche Postbank (effusive WSJ praise for which here); and last week the leaks of DB's €9 bn share sale duly began. Cept it is "at least €9.8 billion". Which is probably more than required for the remains of a target capped at under €6bn (even assuming additional capital injections poor stress tests pointed to in July).

Enter the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. DB's press release appears to preempt the group's own announcement on higher banking capital requirements also due out today (whilst simultaneously justifying it - neat). You can bet in banking headquarters across the globe that Capital Raising Defcon condition is now flashing red as the competition for funds intensifies through year end.

The subplot is euro bank exposure to sovereign PIG bonds. Those stress tests, as a report last Friday from Lloyds points out, showed just half the exposure that the Bank for International Settlements estimates. The enormous difference is likely due to hedging on parts of the exposure using credit default swaps (CDS).

An excerpt from that Lloyds report:

No problem then - why on earth report gross when insured? On the other hand CDS, like other forms of insurance, can carry exclusions. Detail, schmetail.

Bookmark and Share

A fox caught in a trap is capable of gnawing off its leg to escape. The French football squad can do the same. And wthout the need for a trap.

Regulators too, it seems, sport the same self-harming skill set. Take this piece from the New York Times, for example: Volker Rule dilution is imminent. JP Morgan, apparently negotiating to buy hedge fund Gavea Investimentos of Brazil, appears to think so. Even the polite pretence of an uncertain outcome seems not worth their efforts.

There is related form for this sort of thing: the evolution of the USA's Chapter 11 bankruptcy "reorganization" legislation that every large company it was made for has claimed (in this crisis at least) it is too big to suffer though.

Enacted in 1978 it initially allowed a mere 8 exclusions from creditor protection. But that was never going to be enough for bond holding institutions concerned about assuming their risk waiting around to be made good (maybe) while a company gets itself in order.

Which helps to explain how, over the years, Chapter 11 exclusions from creditor protection rose to 34. That the broadest of these related to derivative transactions (none are covered) and included derivative instruments not yet invented is, well, depressingly normal when one takes a gander at the lobbying power behind such outcomes.

Course, 34 exclusions or not, sometimes there just are not enough assets to honour obligations. And for those times when you absolutely must get your capital back - without regard to the health of the underlying economic entity you lent to - credit default swaps were invented. Thank the 1990s era JP Morgan boffins for that. AIG and the US taxpayer certainly have.

But that cautionary tale of regulatory largesse is so 2008 - for now we are getting the Volker Rule. Unfortunately, with no oily pelicans or foreign oil companies in sight the scene is well set for another regulatory goalkeeper Jabulani-moment in the World Cup of finance.

Bookmark and Share

After living many unusual professional and personal weeks since the last entry here, getting back into the swing of bloggy things begins with some forecasts. Will there be a double dip recession? Is this the end of the euro? Which is the greater threat, deflation or inflation? When is the first of a domino-like series of sovereign defaults coming?

Frankly, come June 11, who cares?

In a week where "Woody" of Cheers fame can score the winning penalty for the Rest of the World versus England at Wembley, this attitude, in Bill Gross speak, is "the new normal". At least for the duration of the World Cup.

While other forecasters might feel as comfortable as Tony Hayward at a Friends of the Earth rally when issuing their calls readers can draw comfort from the solidity of the following, financially related tournament forecast: it will be good news for the PIIGS (that qualified without recourse to an EU bailout) until Spain (who beat Portugal in the last 16) fall to Italy in the quarter finals. Germany then explain the concept of a "strong euro" (with concrete examples) to Italy in the semis.

And, if there is a regret in all this, it is that the two Koreas will not meet.

Bookmark and Share

WSJ report, 2010.

Mr Greenspan's "simmer down" quote, vintage 2003, here. And he said it again for good measure two years later adding, with the remarkable prescience that has become his hallmark, that "prices could even decrease".

Little sign in those speeches of all that political pressure to extend credit which he referred to yesterday.

Bookmark and Share

I have requested commission from Simon Johnson for this plug. Unfortunately, I'm too small to matter.

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Simon Johnson
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical HumorHealth Care Reform

Bookmark and Share

Imagine how Diego Maradona feels. On top of all his other concerns in this World Cup year (and they are considerable for Argentina whatever those odds makers claim) he probably was not expecting his own dog to bite him. On the lip. Three times. The upper lip. 'Nips of God'?

The dog is a Shar Pei - a breed of Chinese origin designed for guard duties. Wikipedia has this, amongst its usual anorakian tit-bits, to say on the race:

"It is a largely silent breed, barking only when playing or when worried."[link]

Which brings to mind the FSA. And there is some confusion in the City of London, apparently, about just which mood the regulator is in. Gartmore Group lost 13% of its value last week on mere rumours that one of its star managers had "links" to one of the insider trading suspects arrested on 24 March.

With remarkably unfortunate timing (for there are, it seems, no links to the raids - see Reuters link below) today Gartmore have suspended that same manager (cue share price fall of 30%) and launched an investigation into:

“breaches of internal procedures regarding directing trades”
Which, decoded from My Learned Friend-speak into plain English, might come to be interpreted as "directing trades" not to the cheapest broker but to the most knowledgeable and helpful one.

Possibly comfortingly for Gartmore investors the statement also said:

“Gartmore has not identified any information to date which suggests that Gartmore’s clients have suffered any loss as a result of these breaches,”
The suspended manager, a 3.85% owner of the fund in question, may indeed draw comfort from it. So long as it emerges that Gartmore cack-handedly chose the worst conceivable moment for his reputation to issue today's statement; and the time never comes to establish the plausible deniability that sprinkles of losing "directed trades" provide.

(Business Week report here)
(Reuters story here)

Bookmark and Share

High-end realtors Knight Frank recently published their property porn 'Prime International Residential Index' results for 2009. Some graphics (click for something legible):

And a cherry-picked piece of their commentary which, unsurprisingly even for the house-trained of their species, Knight Frank generously balance out in the rest of the report.

"We have to consider the current support for market growth created by ultra cheap money. In fact it is not just property markets that have succumbed to exuberance – equities and commodities saw prices pushed up sharply during 2009.

Rock-bottom interest rates and the “creation” of money via government stimulus packages have led to an injection of liquidity into the world economy, which has found, inevitably, its way into asset markets, including property, gold and shares.

Low interest costs have protected potentially distressed owners and reduced the supply of property for sale. At the same time, low savings rates have encouraged the wealthy to move investments out of cash and into property in the search for acceptable yields. This has driven demand for property higher and, set against tight supply, has served to push values upwards in many locations.

Ironically, the unintended consequence of government economic stimulus packages has been to support demand and pricing in top-end residential markets – probably not something governments would readily admit to."
By the way, Barbados (thanks to its west coast attractions) was not the bottom performer in the Knight Frank charts. Palma (-22%), Dublin (-25%), western Algarve (-30%) and, for some reason, Dubai (-45%) managed to do worse.

Bookmark and Share

Seems while I was away in Caribbean climes the FSA has itself turned down the volume of the conscious reggae vibe, foresworn the pull(s) of challis, arisen from its lounger and left the beach. Obviously that October "Ghengis" piece was premature.

Conversion to the Genghis Khan School of Market Administration (blind all but one in the village and send this latter fortunate to the next village with the news) is certainly welcome. But it is a long two-way battle.

Related link:
FT: FSA dawn raids shock City

Bookmark and Share

...is usually advice straight out of the wishful thinking school of speculation - for Apple fans are a fervent bunch. Even Marc Faber might hesitate at the idea of selling the company however "heavy" its share price may be acting.

That is because Apple has managed to sell 3.6 million marvellous Macs, 8.7 million incredible iPhones and 21 million intense iPods (actually a decline from the prior quarter) - all just in Q4 2009. Magic touch.

Still, those fans may yet have to cultivate new levels of devotion in order to believe the latest gizmo is as "revolutionary" as Steve Jobs proselytized today. This slab is just an oversized iPod Touch, isn't it?

And maybe the the 'iPad' name could use a rethink.

Bookmark and Share

It is funny how so much can be agreed and yet, when conclusions are drawn, how much of a fundamental divide can remain.

These excerpts, fresh off the presses, come from the IMF's World Economic Outlook update:

"Real activity is rebounding, supported by extraordinary policy stimulus. Global production and trade bounced back in the second half of 2009. Confidence rebounded strongly on both the financial and real fronts, as extraordinary policy support forestalled another Great Depression. In advanced economies, the beginning of a turn in the inventory cycle and the unexpected strength in U.S. consumption contributed to positive developments. Final domestic demand was very strong in key emerging and developing economies, although the turn in the inventory cycle and the normalization of global trade also played an important role.


At the same time, there are still few indications that autonomous (not-policy induced) private demand is taking hold, at least in advanced economies.


Continued policy efforts are needed to sustain the recovery and prepare for exit.


Lastly, policymakers are facing major structural policy challenges. In advanced and emerging economies with excessive external surpluses and domestic saving rates, global rebalancing could be fostered through structural policies to support domestic demand and the development of nontradable sectors. On the other hand, economies that relied excessively on domestic demand-led growth will need to shift resources toward the tradable sector."

And this is Andy "they asked arsonists to put out the fire" Xie, formerly of the Roach / Morgan Stanley stable, last week:

"Some of the bright spots, like bank earnings and GDP growth, that governments are touting as results of the trillions of dollars they have spent are misleading...How could banks make such huge profits? The usual explanation is that banks have traded well, like borrowing short-term funds from the Fed at a zero percent interest rate and investing in treasuries at 3.5% interest rate...Just 2% spread from such trades could yield over USD 300 billions in profits. That seems like a miracle: nobody is hurt, and banks make billions.

The pain is actually postponed in two ways. First, the low funding cost for banks' trading will turn into inflation that dilutes everyone's cash holdings: The Fed is just redistributing money from savers to banks, only the savers don't know it yet. Second, the banks' low funding cost has a government-guarantee component...their profits would be wiped out if the debt market doesn't believe in a government bailout...The cost associated with the guarantee is effectively a free insurance policy from the taxpayers. When the next crisis hits, the cost will materialize. The financial recovery that governments are touting is really a sham; it is just another robbery.


The next crisis will essentially be a continuation of the last one...governments and central banks have thrown trillions of dollars towards preventing necessary economic adjustments, believing that stimulus will bring back growth. The money is buying some time, but the costs are (1) that the governments won't have enough money to cushion the pain during the coming economic restructuring and (2) that inflation will increase misery in an economic downturn.

The whole world is drinking poison to quench its thirst. It may feel like relief now, but the sickness will strike in 2012."

Some people are never happy, of course, and their glass is always half-empty. The IMF appears to put great store in the assumption that private demand will "self-sustain" in due course and that inflation will not prove to be a problem. The rest is tricky but careful management etc etc.

Mr Xie, in contrast, assumes the course of private demand does not really matter much: his balances of probability already suggest that the critical action will concern inflation just when it hurts the most.

Fairly mutually exclusive looking outcomes...

Bookmark and Share

Bill Phillips, whose eponymous curve had been thoroughly roughed up by Milton Friedman by the time I studied it, was far more interesting than the relationship between unemployment and inflation which made him famous fairly well-known.

Or at least so his Wikipedia entry suggests. Personally, I wonder about how 'secret' his prisoner-of-war camp kettle really was. But anyone with the stories (crocodile hunter?) he surely had deserves much slack. All in all, it is somewhat bizarre that it is but the "Phillips Curve" for which he is principally remembered:

And so it is the San Francisco Fed has put together another of its informative, if not lively, Economic Letters called Inflation: mind the gap (from which the above chart). It fits topically into the current, broader, inflation versus deflation debate.

The broad conclusion is that the Phillips Curve would have worked pretty well since 2007 (disruptive economic times suit it, apparently) and, moreover, it suggests inflation will continue to fall - assuming continuing stubbornly high unemployment.

Couple of elephants watching this from armchairs. The Federal Reserve's balance sheet expansion; and (some may struggle to recall this bit) the vaporisation of financial assets over the last 30 (minus the recent 10) months. Or has the letter puts it:

"Our evidence does not imply that inflation cannot run up as long as unemployment remains low. Other factors determine inflation beside the unemployment gap. This is an important and painful lesson that we have learned from the experience of the 1970s. For example, supply shocks and commodity price increases can push inflation up."

Nice examples.

Bookmark and Share

Despite a fifth straight year of being assessed by International Living magazine as offering the globe's best quality of life (top 10 here, all 194 here) it is nice to know that France can still find fault with herself. Or can she? From Le Monde (link):

"Are French banks moderate in bonus matters? According to our calculations, Paris-based traders of French banks, as well as those employed by the French subsidiaries of foreign banks, are set, this March, to enjoy bonus payouts of between €900m et €1bn. It is the equivalent of what 62,000 minimum-wage earners make in a year. [...]

These estimates are based on the statements made by Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde, in Le Figaro on Tuesday, January 12, which valued the take from the bonus tax on 2010 payouts from 2009 performances at around €360m. This 50% tax applies to bonuses over €27,500 - a sum representing nearly 80% of all bonuses paid in France..."

But breath easy, citoyens, although this implies average bonuses of over €250,000. All is relative:

"In this context, and while the severe effects of the financial crisis continue to be felt in the real economy, can we talk of moderation? In their defense, the French banks stress that they compete globally in a market largely dominated by American and British banks. Moreover, in bonus matters, these two continue to lead all others. Last year saw the poaching in London of two star performers from Merrill Lynch, Antonio Polverino and Bruce Van Saun, by the Royal Bank of Scotland. Both men will pocket over 10 million pounds (€11.3 million euros) in bonus guarantees!"

Separately Le Monde also report that high-end Paris property has got its groove back. Little, it appears, to do with the 3,500 registered traders/operators covered in the first article but again, it seems, the work/fault of foreigners. Impoverished, laissez-faire Anglo-Saxons apart.

Bookmark and Share

Just in time to cheer equity bulls for the weekend, the IMF today published one of their "Position Notes" entitled U.S. Consumption after the 2008 Crisis. Its conclusion:

We expect the U.S. consumption to remain at a relatively subdued level over the next several years, with the household saving rate settling at 5–7 percent of disposable personal income, somewhat above the 2009 saving rate of nearly 5 percent. Though the estimate is subject to a sizable statistical uncertainty, it is supported by several alternative estimates and simulation analysis. Compared to the pre-crisis years (2003–07), the estimated changes in saving and consumption imply a decrease in the U.S. private-sector demand of 2–3¾ percentage points of GDP—close to a half of the U.S. current account deficit at its peak. This will have substantial effects on global economic development after the current crisis. [Guess whose emphasis]

Nice long-term graphs, though, for some superb context:

Have a good one and do something precious for Haiti's future with Save the Children.

Bookmark and Share

Do what you can this weekend for Haiti with Save the Children.

Bookmark and Share

With the bonus battle reaching new heights of frenzy, this piece in the WSJ from Professor Macey of Yale Law School jumped out. An excerpt:

"These paychecks are highly rational from the shareholders' perspective...[the] bonuses are big and they are unremittingly linked to performance.

What Mr. Obama and others apparently fail to understand is that the banks' own shareholders benefit from these huge performance bonuses. The bonuses are paid to those who make large profits for their employers—that is, they are linked to performance."

This is, of course, the linchpin of the we-have-to-pay-this-much-or-the-talent-will-walk argument. But what is this "performance" measure that anyone curious to ask about is hard pressed to find defined in mainstream media?

Academic literature is reasonably rich in plausible answers. A notable 2008 paper comes from Smith & Swan and describes increased equity and bonus awards to CEOs as the "road to riches" for shareholders. "Performance" is measured by Return on Assets for operations and by Tobin's Q for firm valuation.

Contrast this with the conclusions in a paper from last month by Michaud & Gai.

"Do CEO compensation schemes in large public companies relate to public company performance? Our empirical research shows that firm’s performance is not affected by CEO compensation.

Does a pay “incentivized” public CEO enhance firm performance? If so, to what degree does this occur? Our empirical research shows that the incentive components of CEO compensation packages including bonuses, stock options, and stock awards do not affect firm performance.

If CEO compensation does not influence firm performance, then how do we account for the relatively high levels of CEO compensation? What factors drive CEO compensation? Our empirical research indicates that that primary factor driving CEO compensation is firm size (measured in net sales). We note that is most likely due to CEO compensation benchmarking and the perception by compensation consultants, boards, and CEOs themselves, that there is a limited pool of talent that can manage large cap U.S. public companies."

Confused? Well, "performance" looks mighty different when considering - not unreasonably - if it means increasing shareholder wealth as defined by a measure (Economic Value Added) that is less artfully determined than Tobin's Q. Looks like Professor Macey may have assumed too much on the shareholder benefit front.

Lurking inside this argument of definitions is the directly related issue of handsome upside compensation versus no downside financial penalty. Try betting all-in at the poker table every hand and disaster awaits. Yet the feeling is that one would be an idiot not to do exactly that when in the world of investment banking compensation structures.

Watching bonuses being paid out this season thanks to the unique episode of massive global government intervention only reinforces this feeling; and efforts to bring symmetry to the problem (clawbacks, the cancellation of deferred share etc) look more like politically expediency than rueful recognition of good fortune and moral hazard.

Bookmark and Share

New counterfeiting data for the euro zone from the ECB reproduced below in graphical form:

Unfortunately, perhaps, for QE and M2 it is not big money in total - €19.9m - although the trend is sharply skywards with the onset of the credit crunch in late 2007:

This mirrors UK trends where, despite the end of the productive career of counterfeiter Stephen Jory in 1998 and the forced change of £20 design this compelled in 2007, the increase in fakes has jumped. With, funnily enough, the specialty being... £20 notes. The UK's Serious Organised Crime Agency has a neat little round-up of matters here.

Including US estimates counterfeits in circulation of dollars, euros and sterling do not appear to exceed $120m (assuming detection is as efficient as all claim). Even after printing off another $50m on top in order to account for the 2006 supernote story the sums would still make Madoff, and other white-collar equivalents, have a laugh.

Bookmark and Share

Ten for 2010. Seriously, put your money on them:

1. Goldman Sachs finances and produces a sequel to the 2009 anti-banker film The International entitled Pulpit Fiction. Lloyd Blankfein stars as ex-Interpol agent Louis Salinger, a driven yet dreamy sort of fellow not entirely at home with the concept of perspective. Hired by publicity-shy Icelandic banking group Krashbanki his life's purpose is the widespread securitisation of the revolutionary Krashbanki instrument, the Ephemerally Backed Indulgence (EBIs). A portfolio of EBIs, claims the proselytising Salinger, can buy entry into heaven.

Sinister villain Martin Luther (uncannily interpreted by Willem Buiter) once worked side by side with Salinger at Krashbanki before a bonus payment contretemps. Now he plots a bloody revenge from his employ as Chief Economist at Krashbanki's archival Sillibank. Watch for his scathingly delivered, Dirty Harry-like tag line “Because Jesus endorsed self-interest, punk!”

2. In the face of poor historical precedent (“The Soviets had no idea what they were doing”) President Obama’s December 1, 2009 decision to send 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan - or one more GI every 21 km2 - secures a remarkable mid-summer 2010 peace accord. The Taliban, the former mujaheddin, communists, assorted reformers, poppy farmers and a motley crew of other hitherto uncooperative tribal warlord interests all admit the recent election of President Karzai was entirely above board and agree to work “together for the greater good”. Transparency International are forced to apologise for the “provocative and without basis” ranking of the country as the 2nd most corrupt in the world. The GIs are all withdrawn by year-end.

3. China’s President Hu Jintao confesses that his country has indeed been manipulating the renminbi and apologises for trying to raise the standard of living of his nation instead of “co-operating” like every other nation does in the global economy. “There was no excuse.” he says between tears in surprisingly fluent, mid-Atlantic lilted English on CNN’s Larry King Live. He continued, “Certainly not our massive industrial over-capacity in everything from umbrellas to shipbuilding that depend totally on export orders. We will just have to do The Right Thing and find ways to stimulate domestic consumption despite the alarming rise in penniless, newly unemployed rioters”.

4. After a 2009 during which central bankers everywhere read or heard that they may possess a secret pleasure zone inside their bodies that, if stimulated correctly, yields intense pleasure (and perhaps even some heady inflationary highs) most of 2010 passes without this alleged “I-spot” being precisely identified as a concrete economic entity. The furious search for the elusive I-spot continues until right up to December when some research teams begin reporting isolated successes (h/t CNN).

5. After losing the June, 2010 UK general election Labour’s Gordon Brown successfully challenges David Cameron for the leadership of the Tory party. Triumphantly returning to 10 Downing Street he declares “This is a momentous day in the long and glorious history of British politics. We have stepped back from the edge of an abyss in whose dark depths lurks a public policy decided by shop stewards over pints of bitter in the smokey back rooms of northern working men's clubs solely for the benefit of avaricious, casino banking, capitalistic wolves. Instead, we will march arm in arm, lock step onto the sunlit prairie of a new democratic dictatorship. Let one hundred flowers bloom instead of Labour boom and bust!”

6. Greek archaeologists working on the underwater site of the ancient Mediterranean harbour and trading centre Pavlopetri uncover a stunning cache of what experts judge to be Mycenaean gold. Initial estimates put the haul at 12,000 metric tonnes worth approximately €300bn – or around 75% of the entire Greek national debt depending on whose statistical service one believes.

Post-find and celebration, Greek Prime Minister Georgos Papandreou puts in a drink-and-dial call to ECB president Jean Claude Trichet transmitting what is later described by diplomats as a “particularly frank conveyance of opinion” regarding the ECB’s earlier refusal to consider any economic aid for the Greeks’ “home-grown” difficulties.

The gold market convulses at the discovery of a trove equal to 10% of the metal's known existing stock. Oil and the euro spike. Greece encourages Italy to take a leaf from its book and divert significant government expenditure to its archaeological service.

7. La Ciciollina, concerned about rising nuclear tensions between Iran and Israel, revives her Middle East mediation technique. She declares "I am available to make love to President Ahmadinejad and Prime Minister Netanyahu to achieve peace in the Middle East. Together or separately. Let me remind everyone what a shame it was Saddam Hussein declined my 1990 and 2002 offers - not to mention my rebuffed 2006 offer to Osama. Just look at where all this hate has led us to!”

Oil, initially steady, drops sharply on rumours of requests by both sides for younger celebrity alternates to the 58 year old Staller.

8. Thought relatively benign at the end of 2009, the H1N1 virus unexpectedly mutates in 2010 and attacks the Apple iPhone, stealing personal data, emptying bank accounts, making prank pizza orders and generally causing mayhem. Interpol rapidly concludes the hybrid virus is the handiwork of an international cabal consisting of the Russian Mafia, militant animal rights campaigners, a global hegemony of Zionist hardliners, Lagos-based Nigerian Muslims and a mysterious sub-group known only as “G”.

Apple shares plunge 65% along with smaller but pronounced drops for the likes of Nokia, Palm and Motorola. Google inexplicably hits 52-week highs whilst the value of UK Premier League transfer deals surges. The prices of pork bellies, oil and flights to Yemen melt up.

Belatedly, the SEC swings into action, condemns all short sellers and asks Harry Markopolos to explain how Madoff might have performed this latest mischief from behind bars.

9. US Treasury Secretary Geithner launches another emergency initiative: the Publicly Underwritten Relief Effort for Commercial Real-estate Assistance Program. The PURECRAP facility targets all commercial property landlords with less than 97% occupancy rates and aims to buy up the voids at average 2007 rates (with a contractual annual rent uplift of inflation + 8.5%).

An army of civil servants is hired to occupy the space, a generous central government headcount increase that insures the smooth administration of not just the PURECRAP but also the TARP, the PPIP, the TALF, the TGLP, the CAP, the TIP, the CPFF, the AMLF and the MMIFF.

PURECRAP is described by President Obama as “Another far-seeing and innovative program of Secretary Geithner’s. It will buttress the perilously poised commercial property market whilst also creating many new and essential jobs. Secretary Geithner continues to enjoy my unwavering support.”

Geithner leaves his post due to “personal reasons” 3 weeks later.

10. As low real interest rates around the globe begin to work what is called by a derided and dismissed few (notably Stephen Roach) “an illusionary magic” and “the papering over of structural faults”, Alan Greenspan finds his reputation fully rehabilitated. Despite the quite phenomenal timing of his May 2008 characterisation of the US economy as being in an “awfully pale recession” (after which equity markets immediately began a nine month fall of 50% and unemployment started its inexorably rise from 5.5% to 10%) the popular press begins once more, as asset prices return to mid 2006 levels, to refer to him as “Maestro”.

Happy New Year!

Bookmark and Share
Related Posts with Thumbnails